Hilda and Martha
This is an excerpt from my essay “Twenty-Two Thousand Days”
(Sonora Review Winter 1999), about my
great-aunt’s line-a-day diaries, which my sister inherited and shared with me
after our great-aunt’s death. My great-aunt died at the age of 99 in 1991, and
was survived for a few years by her partner Martha. The two women had been
together for fifty years.
In the third volume of my
great-aunt’s line-a-day diaries, covering the years 1940-1944, I discovered
several small scraps of paper on which my great-aunt copied out excerpts from
her diaries. One scrap of paper reads:
Jan. 19M + I up late—Breakfastand quiet interlude—lunchto Gallery to see Van Goghpictures. Hat—Emily—MJC+ I to smorgasbord atHotel Rochester.
On the back of the paper, in
Martha’s handwriting, comes the reply:
If I recall we saw FrancesBaker there, too, and Ididn’t have money toput in the Dutchcollection vase—or whateverit was. Also my new hatblew off on Univ. Ave. Right?
For these two women, who lived
together for fifty years, my great-aunt's diaries provided a single lens for the
recollection of a shared life.
She and Martha had been together
for twenty-five years when I was born. I was born to their companionship; it
was natural and unquestioned. My letters were always addressed to both of them,
and in my great-aunt’s replies, Martha was always present—my great-aunt’s other
self. On February 2, 1976, my great-aunt wrote to me:
Ground Hog Day 1976 and what a day it turns out to be! Yesterday we had a thaw. Today we awakened to a blizzard. We had errands planned for today, but instead we are holed in, and thankful that there is food in the larder. Also we are thankful for firewood. If the wind dies down a bit, we’ll have a hearth fire.Martha has been out to the bird feeder with sunflower seeds. The sparrows throw the seeds around,—then come the squirrels to clean up the ground. When spring comes there are a lot of shucks to clean up.I had though to go out and cut boughs from the forsythia bush today—but it isn’t working out that way. I don’t have the equipment for getting through snow banks.
The “we” of my great-aunt’s
letters, her usual pronoun, seemed to split kaleidoscopically into “Martha” and
“I.”
What do I know about their intimate
relationship? I have sixty years of her daily notations, and all I can say for
certain is that she and Martha loved each other. That is all, and everything.
This seems to me to be a beautiful model for a life—a life shared openly and
lovingly, with its secret intimacy always reserved.
I think of those scraps of
paper—Martha’s hat blowing across University Avenure—and all the intimate
associations these diaries evoked, all the richness of shared experience. A diary is a small workshop for the creation of the self. But if anything, my great-aunt’s diaries, full of their shared experience, were
aimed not at the creation of the “I,” but at the creation of the “we.” The “we”
of her letters, the “we” that slid back and forth between two women for fifty
years, on scraps of paper, in conversation, in the silence between words.


Comments